To the extent the claims are based on access to systems, they fail because X Corp. has alleged no more than threadbare recitals, parroting laws and findings in other cases without providing any supporting evidence... To the extent the claims are based on scraping and selling of data, they fail because they are preempted by federal law...
The judge found that X Corp's argument exposed a tension between the platform's desire to control user data while also enjoying the safe harbor of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act...
If X got its way, Alsup warned, X Corp. would entrench its own private copyright system that rivals, even conflicts with, the actual copyright system enacted by Congress...
[
add
]
[
|
|
...
]